SUPERCHARGE YOUR CHESS
Give me 21 Days and I Will Show You How to
Become a Dramatically Better Chess Player
- 3 Most Tricky Mate-in-1 Positi...
If f pawn is promoted, king can go to g5. so it i...
- 7 Reasons Why Magnus Carlsen i...
Hello WGM Raruca and IM Renier. Thanks for sharing...
- 3 Most Tricky Mate-in-1 Positi...
for #2, how are we meant to know it's a reversed c...
- 7 Best Games Played with Evans...
But how can you omit "The Evergreen Game",Adolf An...
- 10 Best Games on Dutch Defense...
But how can u omit "The Polish Immortal", Glucksbe...
Chess Players Online:We have 237 guests online
|Stop Making the No. 1 Chess Mistake Once and For All!|
|Written by Yury Markushin|
|Wednesday, 28 September 2016 00:00|
What's the number one mistake that prevents 95% of players from playing better chess? Is it the way they approach openings or middlegames? Is it how they treat tactical complications or theoretical endgames? It actually goes far beyond that. The No. 1 mistake has to do with the core of chess understanding. Are you making the same mistake? The chances are high you do. Find out for yourself!
I won't waste your time with the long introduction.
The No. 1 mistake majority of chess players are making is irrational use of information.
The information comes from various sources including websites, discussions groups, books and so forth. A modern chess player accumulates ginormous amounts of knowledge about the game. Many things don't make sense and can even be contradictory. It would seem that the knowledge should translate into quality of your play, but that's where logic fails us.
After a certain point extra information does nothing for your chess.
That's right. You will not become any stronger as a player, if you increase amount of knowledge you already have. After your brain gets saturated with chess ideas, it will be harder to absorb extra bits and pieces. You will reach a point when the knowledge will do more harm than good. A point of diminishing return, if you wish.
The key to enjoy full benefits from chess knowledge is to have some sort of system. All information that you get should contribute to your decisions over the board. If the information cannot help you at obtaining an advantage, there is no use to keep it.
The problem comes because you have no idea whether the information you have is useful or not. What should you do? One of the solutions is to focus on skills rather than knowledge.
What is the difference between chess knowledge and a skill?
Let me give you a simple example with Two Bishop Checkmate. There is a big difference between knowing how to checkmate a lone king with two bishops and being able to do that.
If you just have knowledge about two bishops checkmate you would:
1. Know that it is possible to checkmate a lone king with two bishops and a king
2. Know that it is possible to do that in under 50 moves
3. Know that the checkmate is achieved by cornering opponent's king
What is missing here is HOW. Knowledge is great, but it won't checkmate with two bishops for you. If you have a skill of checkmating with two bishops, you will do the following steps:
1. Occupy the central squares with the bishops
2. Relocate your king to support the bishops
3. Shift your bishops towards the edge of the board to reduce opponent king's mobility
4. Move the king closer to support the bishops once again
5. Repeat the procedure until the opponent's king is cornered to deliver a checkmate with one of the bishops
Even if a player knows the above steps by heart, he won't be able to checkmate the king with two bishops.
If you try that exercise against a computer, you will quickly realize that it's not as simple as it seems. The king may start retreating differently than shown in the tutorial. He won't cooperate at going to the right corner, and will even start attacking the bishops. The starting position maybe different and it will throw you off completely. We are not even talking about the real game situation with the clock ticking.
There are many important details about this checkmate that you simply cannot learn from the books. The only way to master it is by practicing either over the board or on a computer. That's what skill is about, being able to do it.
The practical element is something that is missing in most of the chess courses and books. Many players don't realize that the skill, not the knowledge is something that matters.
By observing how others box on the TV, even with great commentary, you won't become a good boxer or any boxer at all. You need the skills. You need to go out there and try it. Chess is no different. You need to apply the knowledge to build the skill.
That's why all our training courses have practical sections. In 21 Day Course we provide students with daily tasks and assignments to make sure they build those skills. In our video courses we also have a practicum section with tasks and homework. These things are the key of any training course. They are something that separates being able to checkmate the king with two bishops or not.
To summarize, if you only remember a single thing from this article, I want you to remember to work on your skills, not simply accumulating knowledge. The skill is something that wins games.
"There Are 3 Main Problems That 95% of All Chess Players Are Facing... "
You will instantly discover how you can significantly improve your game, adding hundreds of elo points without hiring an expensive chess coach or spending 5 hours a day on chess !
|Last Updated on Wednesday, 28 September 2016 09:35|