In this update on ChessPublishing.com our columnist draws attention to trends in openings, old and new-Ed.
Chess olympiads offer a wealth of ideas to connoisseurs of opening theory.
Indeed, there was a profusion of novelties (good and bad!) in the recently concluded Olympiad at Tromso.
The trophy for TN lay with the following line in Scandinavian (Centre Counter Defence as known to old-fashioned folks): 1.e4 d5 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Qd8!?
Now that is a curious statement to make as the first ever recorded game of chess featured the same move 3…Qd8 way back in 1475! What is more, there are more than 8000 games with this line alone. Yet it is not as well-known as its cousin 3…Qa5. But this time, appropriately enough, it made a triumphant return in Norway that happens to be a Scandinavian nation.
The position here was reached as many as seven times in Tromso and the score… +4 -2 =1 in favour of Black.
(Neil McDonald mentions only the four grandmaster encounters in Tromso. Black only lost once, when Magnus Carlsen was playing White)
Carlsen who beat the line with White was sufficiently impressed to try it himself with Black when he played Caruana a few rounds later. He won. So did Iotov against Karjakin. In each case White had a pleasant position. But the surprise had its effect and White was not able to deal with unforeseen problems over the board.
In his update at ChessPublishing.com Neil McDonald analyses all these games. While I have some reservations about this line I must mention his analysis as worthy of attention.
I have simplified his work a bit and added some of my own explanation for young readers here.
3…Qd8 Variation in Scandinavian Defence
In retrospect Carlsen’s engagement with the Scandinavian does not seem to have lasted long. He did not play it in the recently concluded 2nd Sinquefield Tournament. To all appearances this was a one-off experiment on his part.
To return to the Olympiad, grandmaster games did not always contribute to theory. A case in point is the Shirov-Sulskis encounter in which each player was trying to avoid preparation by the other. The result was plain bad play.
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6 4.Ng5 d5 5.exd5 Nxd5? 6.Bxf7 (Two Knights Defence)
In my view this encounter should not have been given any importance by GM Victor Mikhalevski in his column on open games, e4 e5.
So how should they have played this opening? Paul Morphy showed it long ago and for purity of conception and execution his performance remains peerless. I have included the game in the analysis here.
5… Nxd5 line in Two Knights Defence
Who wants to play 6.Nxf7 when White has a stronger option in 6.d4?
Otherwise Mikhalevski’s update on open games is useful. Don’t be discouraged by that “tame” draw, Adams-Aronian, in Marshall Attack. If you look at the notes and also archives a lot of work has been done here by Mikhalevski and others.
There is much else to explore on ChessPublishing.com. Pay a visit and check it out for yourself.
We are already in September. So there is more to come by the month end. Watch this space.